ד"ר אליק פלמן
PhD. University of London (UCL). 2002-2007. Philosophy
Supervisors: Paul Snowdon (chair), Tim Crane
Examiners: Genoveva Marti, Christopher Hughes
MA (Research). Hebrew University, 1998-2001. Philosophy and History of Science
Supervisor: Yemima Ben-Menahem. Examiner: Michael Roubach
Awarded the Bar-Hillel Prize 'for an outstanding MA thesis'
BA. Hebrew University, 1993-1996. Joint degree: Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Program
Dean's List of Distinguished BA Students
Temporary lectureship, Bar Ilan University, Department of Philosophy & Department of Brain Science, 2010-Present
Author, Open University, Department of Philosophy, 2014–present
ISF research, The Internal Structure of Imaginary Projects, research project led by Dr. Alon Chasid, 2016-2018
The Van Leer Research Group in Epistemology, 2010-2012
Formal Methods in Philosophy, invited by The Nordic Academy for Advanced Study, Lund University, Sweden, 2005
Honors and Awards
Overseas Research Scheme, UK (ORS), 2002-2006
A. J. Ayer Scholarship in Philosophy, UCL, 2002-2006
Goodenough College Carden Bursary 2004-2006
AVI Fellowships, 2002-2005
The Bar-Hillel Prize ‘for an outstanding graduate student in the history and philosophy of science’, The Hebrew University, 2002
The Faculty of Humanities Full Studentship ‘for a distinguished MA (research) student’, Hebrew University, 2000-2002.
Fellow, Environmental Fellows Program, The Heschel Sustainability Center, 2008-9
Abstract Possible world semantics considers not only what an expression actually refers to, but also what it might have referred to in counterfactual circumstances. This has proven exceptionally useful both inside and outside philosophy. The way this is achieved is by using intensions. An intension of an expression is a function that assigns to each possible world the reference of the expression in that world. However, the specific intension of terms has been subject to frequent disputes. How is one to determine the intension of a term? Carnap has shown how the intension of a term depends on the type of that term. Two-dimensional semantics has shown how intensions also depend on the actual state of affairs. I will show how, in addition, intensions are no less dependent on metaphysical criteria of identity. Furthermore, I will reveal how these three factors interact to fix the exact intension of a term. In other words, I propose an outline of the overall mechanism by which intensions are being fixed.
Abstract: Two current leading positions about the relation between the mental and the physical are analytical functionalism, which identifies mental states with physical states, and Kripke's position, which seriously challenges such identification. The dispute between Kripke's view and Lewis's analytical functionalism boils down to whether the term ‘pain’ is rigid or nonrigid. It is a strong intuition of ours that if it feels like pain it is pain, and vice versa, so that ‘pain’ should designate, with respect to every possible world, all and only states felt as pain. I show that, despite crucial differences in both their semantic and metaphysical assumptions, surprisingly, both views meet this intuition equally well. Thus it appears that, at least with respect to this particular dispute, the jury is still out on whether mental states are identical to physical states.
Abstract: It has become widely accepted that theoretical identities like 'water = H2O' or 'heat = mean kinetic molecular energy' are necessary. However, some have challenged this claim. I propose yet another challenge in the form of a sceptical argument, i.e., that for all we know, theoretical identities may not be necessary. The argument is based on the contention that the necessity of theoretical identities is dependent upon criteria of identity. Since we do not know which criteria of identity in fact obtain, it follows that, for all we know, theoretical identities may not be necessary.
Chapters in Books
Abstract: I argue that intensions (in the sense of reference across possible worlds) are sensitive to all of the following: semantic issues, metaphysical issues, and the state of the actual world. I outline a ‘calculator of intensions’, that when provided with the appropriate data with respect to a given term, generates the term’s intension. I conclude with implications concerning rigidity.
The Philosophy of Science, Open University Press, Textbook (Heb) (commissioned, in preparation)
Abstract: I put forward a theory of reference across possible worlds. I locate the factors that determine reference, and provide a model of how they interact to fix reference. The applicability of the thesis is demonstrated by utilising it to analyse and explain away two important debates in contemporary analytical philosophy: the debate over the identity theory of mind, and the debate over the semantic significance of Donnellan’s referential / attributive distinction.
Referee for: American Philosophical Quarterly (APQ); Journal of Philosophical Research (JPR); Iyyun.
'Is Confirmation Inductive?'; presented at
- The Annual Conference of the Israeli Society for the History and Philosophy of Science, 2019
‘Physicalism after All - A Reply to Nachtomy and Shifroni’; presented at
- The Annual Conference of the Israeli Philosophy Association, 2019
‘Ontology Generator’; presented at:
- Haifa University, Departmental Seminar, 2018
- Bar-Ilan University, Departmental Colloquim, 2016
'What can the Logic of Scientific Inquiry Offer to Attorneys?'; presented in:
- Litigation in Parliament and Ministerial Committees, Ministry of Justice, Institute of Legal Training of
Attorneys and Legal Advisers, 2016.
‘Theoretical Identities May Not Be Necessary’; presented in:
- Ben Gurion University Departmental Colloquium, 2014
- Bar Ilan University Departmental Colloquium, 2014
‘Population Growth and Ecological Footprint’; presented in:
- The Annual Conference for Science and Environment, Bar Ilan University, 2014
‘Semantics of ‘Pain’; Metaphysics of Pain’; presented in:
- Another World is Possible: An International Conference on David Lewis, Urbino, Italy, 2011
‘Three-Dimensional Semantics’; presented in:
- The Van Leer Research Group on Epistemology, Jerusalem, 2011 (invited speaker)
- The Logic and Metaphysics Research Group, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 2011 (invited speaker)
- The Bar Ilan Philosophy Colloquium, 2011
‘A Blueprint for a Calculator of Intensions’; presented in:
- International Conference on Formal Ontology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore USA, 2006
- European Society for Analytical Philosophy, Lisbon, 2006
- Philosophy Colloquium, Hebrew University, 2007
‘The Varieties of Identity’; presented in:
- Identity: Ontological Perspectives, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, May 2005
- University of Utah, USA, February 2005
עיקריים: פילוסופיה של השפה, מטאפיזיקה, פילוסופיה של המדע
משניים: פילוסופיה של מדעי החברה, פילוסופיה של הנפש, לוגיקה, אתיקה סביבתית.
פילוסופיה של השפה
פילוסופיה של המדע
פילוסופיה של מדעי החברה
פילוסופיה של הנפש
קריפקה, שמות והכרח
היסטוריה של המדע
מבוא למטאפיזיקה ותורת ההכרה
רמות תיאור, רדוקציה ונסמכות
מדינה, משק ומוסר